Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Appl Lab Med ; 6(2): 486-490, 2021 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-990735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While it is presumed that immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression, are at greater risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection than the general population, the antibody response to infection in this patient population has not been studied. METHODS: In this report, we follow the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing exogenous immunosuppression. Specifically, we studied the antibody response of 3 solid organ transplant recipient patients, 3 patients who take daily inhaled fluticasone, and a patient on etanercept and daily inhaled fluticasone, and compared them to 5 patients not on exogenous immunosuppression. RESULTS: We found that the solid organ transplant patients on full immunosuppression are at risk of having a delayed antibody response and poor outcome. We did not find evidence that inhaled steroids or etanercept predispose patients to delayed immune response to SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: The data presented here suggest that solid organ transplant recipients may be good candidates for early targeted intervention against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Administration, Inhalation , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/isolation & purification , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Serological Testing/statistics & numerical data , Calcineurin Inhibitors/adverse effects , Etanercept/adverse effects , Female , Fluticasone/administration & dosage , Fluticasone/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 155(3): 343-353, 2021 02 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-913143

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Serologic detection of prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is needed for definition of convalescent plasma donors, for confounding SARS-CoV-2 presentation, and for seroprevalence studies. Reliable serologic assays with independent validation are required. METHODS: Six SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays from Beckman Coulter, Euroimmun (IgG, IgA), Roche, and Siemens (Centaur, Vista) were assessed for specificity (n = 184), sensitivity (n = 154), and seroconversion in a defined cohort with clinical correlates and molecular SARS-CoV-2 results. RESULTS: Assay specificity was 99% or greater for all assays except the Euroimmun IgA (95%). Sensitivity at more than 21 days from symptom onset was 84%, 95%, 72%, 98%, 67%, and 96% for Beckman Coulter, Centaur, Vista, Roche, Euroimmun IgA, and Euroimmun IgG, respectively. Average day of seroconversion was similar between assays (8-10 d), with 2 patients not producing nucleocapsid antibodies during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibodies may be less reliably produced early in disease than spike protein antibodies. Assessment of convalescent plasma donors at more than 30 days from symptom onset and seroprevalence studies should use assays with defined sensitivity at time points of interest because not all assays detected antibodies reliably at more than 30 days.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19/therapy , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Humans , Immunization, Passive , Plasma , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Seroconversion , Seroepidemiologic Studies , COVID-19 Serotherapy
3.
Clin Biochem ; 86: 8-14, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-733900

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection has been reported in several patient cohorts with results that vary by method and population studied due to the lack of reliable commercial assays available as the pandemic initially spread. We sought to clinically assess commercial prototype SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA assays for use in screening for prior infection and convalescent plasma donation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Prototype SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA assays from Euroimmun were assessed utilizing remnant specimens. Specificity testing used specimens in their convalescent window for the common coronaviruses and other infectious diseases known to be associated with increased non-specificity in serologic assays. Sensitivity testing utilized serial specimens from molecularly confirmed SARS-CoV-2 critically ill patients to assess seroconversion. Utilizing recombinant spike protein we also developed a competitive confirmation procedure to increase assay specificity. RESULTS: We determined specificity to be 97% and 81%, respectively, when indeterminate samples were considered positive and 99% and 86% when indeterminate samples were considered negative. We developed a new confirmation methodology to enhance the specificity of the assays with an anticipated specificity of 98% for IgA. Valuation of hospitalized COVID-19 patients determined median IgA seroconversion to be 8 days and IgG 10 days. Neither level nor timing of antibody response correlated with days on ventilation. End titer measurements indicate that validated improved assays may be capable of semi-quantitative measurement. CONCLUSIONS: We found these assays to be clinically acceptable for the high prevalence population tested, for instance, for convalescent plasma donation.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Serological Testing , COVID-19/blood , Immunoglobulin A/blood , Immunoglobulin G/blood , SARS-CoV-2/metabolism , Humans , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL